Room in Rome, 2010
Director: Julio Medem
Cast: Elena Anaya, Natasha Yarovenko, Enrico Lo
Stage: Home theatre
Room in Rome in short: A hotel room in the center of Rome serves as the setting for two young and recently acquainted women to have a physical adventure that touches their very souls.
Preps: None in perticular - I am not familiar with the topic nor the movie itself. So no expectations in perticular, just hope to get a good job at selecting the next one..in the row of many to come on my disk.
Reality: The movie begins quite interestingly - draws my attention because of the sexual tension it brings. Obviously the two women are going to end up in bed, the mere question is after what time and up to what extent. Or in what pose, to turn this a bit into humour. Because after 20 minutes, this is all you are stuck with. The movie doesn't have a glow, it doesn't posess the energy. The vision lacking, the idea is stuck somewhere in the beginning of the movie. I don't like it even one bit.
On the other hand, it does hold some potential to be one of more sexy movies lately, strictly in terms of arrowsement. Nothing about it makes it even a bit more interesting. The picturesque city could be exploited more - the viewer is stuck with erotic moments of two ladies in the room. For this reason all televisions worldwide hold porn channels. And in some cases, better ones, including two or even more women. I am not claiming that a scene with two women cannot be extraordinary, or brilliant, just The Room in Rome doesn't posess any in perticular. For that reason, the movie vanishes quickly off my disk. A mistake to watch, don't recommend it. The cast, the scene, dialogues, lack of music, lack of interest from my side.. all this rests in my head, when I am writing this. Therefore, use your time more wisely.
My personal rating: 0 (no comment, a waste to watch).
Room in Rome on IMDB
my god! i have never read such a review of room in rome,how could you just overlook the intense complex psychological behaviour of the two women?how could you just not notice that how beautifully the film tries to reveal the intensity of relation between two women,and how a man,being a conqueror,fails to come out of the sense of possessing,the feeling of ownership.room in rome is also one of the few Hollywood films in which music was beautifully used.and the intimate scenes,my god! human body shown so wonderfully,with so much detailing just like a plateau,i am bowled by Room in Rome,i have always been against pornography,for that it shows sex comes out of no attachment,room in rome helped me to case an example against the porn flicks.sex can be used in such a wonderful way.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that sexual scenes, deriving from a relationship which is already established or is being established at the moment of the scene can contribute to the energy of the scene and the vision of the movie. I don't think that the women think past their relationship in Rome and that unfortunately it is limited to the scene it poses, the Room. I love the passage between shame and real erotic. However, I don't think the director has seen anything past the Room in Rome. I think we all need to know what happens next. And this is precisely what the movie is lacking in my perception. the sexual scenes are splendid and I enjoyed them so much. However, the movie isn't made only of the scenes about sex. The movie needs to pose something more. That is why I wrote such a revision. I agree that the scenes are splendid, I just lack the depth in the movie. The reasons, why they were there, what caused the action, the conversation that all people have before and after. It needed a step forward, Room in Rome.
ReplyDelete